BABERGH DISTRICT COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER, COUNCIL OFFICES, CORKS LANE, HADLEIGH ON WEDNESDAY, 14 JANUARY 2009
Quick Links
PRESENT: Mr R W Thake – Chairman
|
Mr P K Beer Mr M P Booth Mr J R B Cave Mr P G Gibson Mr P J Holbrook Mr L S Johnson |
Mr R E Kemp Mr D C Rose Mr R C Smith Mr A J Ward Mr G S White Mr R Whiting |
The following Members were unable to be present:- Mr C W Arthey, Mr P Jones, Mr D H Keane and Mr B L Lazenby.
It was noted that in accordance with Council Procedure Rule No. 5 substitutes were in attendance as follows:-
Mr R E Kemp (substituting for Mr P Jones) Mr M P Booth (substituting for Mr B L Lazenby)
Mr R W Thake declared a prejudicial interest in Application No. B/08/01747 (Paper H161 – Item 4) as the applicant is known to him. He vacated the Chair and was not present during consideration of the item.
Mr M P Booth declared a prejudicial interest in Application No. B/08/01681 (Paper H161– Item 3) as he was the applicant. He was not present during consideration of the item.
Mr G S White declared a personal and prejudicial interest in respect of Application No. B/08/01760 (Paper H161– Item 1) by virtue of being a member of the South Suffolk Leisure Board and would not participate except to speak as a Member of the Board. After addressing the meeting in that capacity he left the Chamber and was not present during consideration of the item.
RESOLVED
That the Minutes of the meeting held on 10 December 2008 be confirmed and signed as a correct record.
None received.
None received.
RESOLVED
(1) That site inspections be held on Wednesday, 21 January 2009 in respect of the under-mentioned sites, prior to consideration of the applications by the Committee:-
|
NEWTON
Application No. B/08/01789 |
Application for Listed Building Consent – retention of retractable canopy to the south east elevation and provision of wheelchair access, Saracens Head. |
|
Mr P J Holbrook, Ward Member for Bures St Mary, requested a site inspection to enable Members to assess the impact of the canopy upon the character of the listed building.
|
|
HOLBROOK
Application No. B/08/01710 |
Full Application – erection of detached dwelling, construction of new vehicular access, former sewage works at Ipswich Road.
|
|
Mr D C Rose, Ward Member for Holbrook, requested a site inspection for Members to assess the impact of the development on a site outside the village, and to assess the means of access.
|
|
HARKSTEAD
Application No. B/08/01674 |
Full Application – erection of two-storey detached dwelling, construction of new vehicular access/parking to serve “Windy Ridge”, “Windy Ridge”, The Street. |
|
Mr D C Rose, Ward Member for Holbrook, requested a site inspection to enable Members to assess the impact of the development upon the street scene. |
(2) That a Panel comprising the following Members be appointed to inspect the site:-
|
Mr C W Arthey Mr P K Beer Mr J R B Cave Mr P J Holbrook Mr L S Johnson Mr D H Keane Mr B L Lazenby |
Mr D C Rose Mr R C Smith Mr R W Thake Mr A J Ward Mr G S White Mr R Whiting |
Members had before them an Addendum to Paper H161 (circulated to Members prior to the commencement of the meeting) summarising additional correspondence received since the publication of the Agenda, but before 12 noon on the working day before the meeting, together with errata.
Details of further representations received in respect of Item Nos. 1 and 2 were reported to the meeting and considered and taken into account before a decision was made in each case.
In accordance with the Council‘s procedure for public speaking on planning applications, representations were made as detailed below:-
Planning Application No. Representations From
B/08/01760 Mr R Ward (Objector)
Mr G S White (Member)
B/08/01726 Mr H Carpenter (Agent for the Applicant)
B/08/01591 Mr S Elias (Applicant)
RESOLVED
That, subject to the imposition of conditions or reasons for refusal (whether additional or otherwise), in accordance with delegated powers under Council Minute No. 48(a) dated 19 October 2004, decisions on the items referred to in Paper H161 be made as follows:-
|
(a) HADLEIGH
Application No. B/08/01760 Paper H161 – Item 1 |
Full Application – erection of new Hadleigh leisure facility and associated site works, Stonehouse Road. |
RESOLVED
That planning permission be granted, subject to the following conditions:-
- Materials
- Noise reduction measures
- Car parking strategy and management scheme
- Highway improvements at junction (Grampian Condition)
- Parking arrangements
- Implementation of and management of the outdoor patio area
- Boundary treatment
- Landscaping
- Design details
- External lighting
- Archaeology
- Promotion of green travel arrangements
- Hours of operation (6.30 am – 10.00 pm weekdays, 7.30 am – 5.00 pm Saturday, 10.30am – 8.00 pm Sundays).
|
(b) SUDBURY
Application No. B/08/01276 Paper H161 – Item 2 |
Outline Application – erection of 48 dwellings comprising five 3-bed town houses, twelve 3-bed houses, thirteen 2-bed homes and eighteen 2-bed apartments and provision of associated parking/garaging and construction of new vehicular access (existing industrial buildings to be demolished), former Lury House, Samson Motorworks and Sudbury Motor Factors, Bulmer Road. |
A motion to grant planning permission, subject to appropriate conditions was moved and seconded. This was subsequently withdrawn.
RESOLVED
That planning permission be refused for the following reasons:-
-
Inappropriate use of allocated employment site (Policy EM02)
-
Insufficient justification/marketing (Policy EM24)
-
Sensitive End-User/Proximity to Ballingdon Waste Pumping Station (PPS23)
-
Lack of information regarding the Sequential Test and Drainage (PPS25)
-
Insufficient affordable housing provision (Policy HS08)
-
Scale of development/impact on locality (HS27 and 30)
|
(c) HOLBROOK
Application No. B/08/01591 Paper H161 – Item 5 |
Full Application – conversion of dairy barn to one dwelling and associated landscaping, Alton Green Farm, Alton Green. |
Notwithstanding the recommendation of the Chief Planning Control Officer to refuse planning permission, a motion to grant planning permission was moved as Members considered that the proposal was not contrary to Policies CR19 and HS04 because of its value in the landscape and the contribution it makes to the adjacent Tye Green. Upon being put to the vote, this motion was carried.
RESOLVED
(1) That, the Solicitor to the Council be authorised to secure a Planning Obligation under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to provide:-
A financial contribution to be used towards the off-site provision of public open space (Policy HS32). (2) That, subject to the completion of the Planning Obligation referred to in Resolution (1) above to the satisfaction of the Solicitor to the Council, the Chief Planning Control Officer be authorised to grant planning permission, subject to conditions, including:-
- Materials and detailing
- Landscaping
- Archaeology
- As recommended by LHA
- Contamination
(3) That in the event of the Planning Obligation referred to in Resolution (1) above not being secured, the Chief Planning Control Officer be authorised to refuse planning permission for the following reason:-
Inadequate provision for public open space being contrary to Policy HS32 and PPG17.
Prior to the consideration of the item referred to in (d) below, Mr R W Thake, who had declared a prejudicial interest in the matter, vacated the Chair and left the room. Mr P K Beer took the Chair for this item.
|
(d) GREAT CORNARD
Application No. B/08/01747 Paper H161 – Item 4 |
Full Application – erection of a 17.5 metre high telecommunications pole with two antennas and equipment cabinet, land north of Shawlands Avenue. |
RESOLVED
That planning permission be granted, subject to the following conditions:-
|
(e) NAYLAND-WITH-WISSINGTON
Application No. B/08/01681 Paper H161 – Item 3 |
Full Application – conversion of single storey stable to workshop. Erection of wooden shed, 3 Fox Cottages, Bures Road. |
RESOLVED
That planning permission be granted, subject to the following condition:-
- Colour of staining to shed
The business of the meeting was concluded at 1.05 p.m.
Chairman
|